Malta vs South Asia: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square

Malta
65.64 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
South Asia
1.11 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta rank
6th
South Asia rank
8th

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square over time

  • Malta
  • South Asia
020.0M40.0M60.0M196119922023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 65.64 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.11 million current US$ per square kilometre in South Asia, a difference of 64.53 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 59.0 times South Asia's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

Malta ranks 6th and South Asia ranks 8th of 204 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta South Asia Difference Ahead
1970s 1.45 million current US$ per square kilometre 32,026 current US$ per square kilometre 1.41 million current US$ per square kilometre Malta
1980s 4.24 million current US$ per square kilometre 73,156 current US$ per square kilometre 4.17 million current US$ per square kilometre Malta
1990s 9.45 million current US$ per square kilometre 112,219 current US$ per square kilometre 9.33 million current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2000s 17.30 million current US$ per square kilometre 259,744 current US$ per square kilometre 17.05 million current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2010s 33.67 million current US$ per square kilometre 688,288 current US$ per square kilometre 32.98 million current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2020s 56.04 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.02 million current US$ per square kilometre 55.03 million current US$ per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square, Malta or South Asia?
Malta, at 65.64 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.11 million current US$ per square kilometre in South Asia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square between Malta and South Asia?
64.53 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and South Asia?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Malta and South Asia rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square?
Malta ranks 6th and South Asia ranks 8th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs South Asia: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malta/south-asia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malta/south-asia/">Malta vs South Asia: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
243 places, 10,300 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.