Jordan vs Rwanda: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square

Jordan
564,324 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
569,846 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Jordan rank
102nd
Rwanda rank
101st

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square over time

  • Jordan
  • Rwanda
0200.0k400.0k600.0k196519942023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 569,846 current US$ per square kilometre against 564,324 current US$ per square kilometre in Jordan, a difference of 5,522 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Jordan ahead.

Jordan ranks 102nd and Rwanda ranks 101st of 204 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 4 and Rwanda in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 6,556 current US$ per square kilometre 6,435 current US$ per square kilometre 120.52 current US$ per square kilometre Jordan
1970s 15,641 current US$ per square kilometre 21,321 current US$ per square kilometre 5,680 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 52,102 current US$ per square kilometre 71,968 current US$ per square kilometre 19,866 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 60,802 current US$ per square kilometre 71,797 current US$ per square kilometre 10,996 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 147,156 current US$ per square kilometre 115,946 current US$ per square kilometre 31,210 current US$ per square kilometre Jordan
2010s 402,894 current US$ per square kilometre 305,841 current US$ per square kilometre 97,052 current US$ per square kilometre Jordan
2020s 519,520 current US$ per square kilometre 479,609 current US$ per square kilometre 39,910 current US$ per square kilometre Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square, Jordan or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 569,846 current US$ per square kilometre against 564,324 current US$ per square kilometre in Jordan as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square between Jordan and Rwanda?
5,522 current US$ per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Rwanda?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Jordan and Rwanda rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square?
Jordan ranks 102nd and Rwanda ranks 101st of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jordan vs Rwanda: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-us-per-square-kilometre/jordan/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-us-per-square-kilometre/jordan/rwanda/">Jordan vs Rwanda: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
243 places, 10,300 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.