Hong Kong, China vs Singapore: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square

Hong Kong, China
354.50 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore
675.81 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong, China rank
4th
Singapore rank
3rd

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Singapore
0200.0M400.0M600.0M196119922023

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 675.81 million current US$ per square kilometre against 354.50 million current US$ per square kilometre in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 321.31 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Singapore's figure about 1.9 times Hong Kong, China's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 4th and Singapore ranks 3rd of 204 countries.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Singapore Difference Ahead
2000s 170.97 million current US$ per square kilometre 183.67 million current US$ per square kilometre 12.70 million current US$ per square kilometre Singapore
2010s 277.66 million current US$ per square kilometre 421.20 million current US$ per square kilometre 143.53 million current US$ per square kilometre Singapore
2020s 334.49 million current US$ per square kilometre 602.36 million current US$ per square kilometre 267.87 million current US$ per square kilometre Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square, Hong Kong, China or Singapore?
Singapore, at 675.81 million current US$ per square kilometre against 354.50 million current US$ per square kilometre in Hong Kong, China as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square between Hong Kong, China and Singapore?
321.31 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Singapore?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Hong Kong, China and Singapore rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square?
Hong Kong, China ranks 4th and Singapore ranks 3rd of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Singapore: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/singapore/">Hong Kong, China vs Singapore: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
243 places, 10,300 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.