Hong Kong, China vs OECD members: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square

Hong Kong, China
354.50 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
OECD members
1.57 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Hong Kong, China rank
4th
OECD members rank
5th

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • OECD members
0100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M197019962023

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 354.50 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.57 million current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members, a difference of 352.93 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 225.9 times OECD members's.

Across all 22 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong, China ranks 4th and OECD members ranks 5th of 204 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China OECD members Difference Ahead
2000s 170.97 million current US$ per square kilometre 958,536 current US$ per square kilometre 170.01 million current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2010s 277.66 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.32 million current US$ per square kilometre 276.35 million current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2020s 325.40 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.49 million current US$ per square kilometre 323.91 million current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square, Hong Kong, China or OECD members?
Hong Kong, China, at 354.50 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.57 million current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square between Hong Kong, China and OECD members?
352.93 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and OECD members?
22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
How do Hong Kong, China and OECD members rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square?
Hong Kong, China ranks 4th and OECD members ranks 5th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs OECD members: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/oecd-members/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/oecd-members/">Hong Kong, China vs OECD members: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
243 places, 10,300 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.