Guatemala vs New Zealand: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square

Guatemala
908,977 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
892,621 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
80th
New Zealand rank
82nd

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square over time

  • Guatemala
  • New Zealand
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k1.0M196519942023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 908,977 current US$ per square kilometre against 892,621 current US$ per square kilometre in New Zealand, a difference of 16,356 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1971 it was New Zealand ahead.

Guatemala ranks 80th and New Zealand ranks 82nd of 204 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala New Zealand Difference Ahead
1970s 37,619 current US$ per square kilometre 52,245 current US$ per square kilometre 14,625 current US$ per square kilometre New Zealand
1980s 78,400 current US$ per square kilometre 110,528 current US$ per square kilometre 32,128 current US$ per square kilometre New Zealand
1990s 128,513 current US$ per square kilometre 192,812 current US$ per square kilometre 64,299 current US$ per square kilometre New Zealand
2000s 243,380 current US$ per square kilometre 346,409 current US$ per square kilometre 103,029 current US$ per square kilometre New Zealand
2010s 530,605 current US$ per square kilometre 655,194 current US$ per square kilometre 124,589 current US$ per square kilometre New Zealand
2020s 794,983 current US$ per square kilometre 846,796 current US$ per square kilometre 51,812 current US$ per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square, Guatemala or New Zealand?
Guatemala, at 908,977 current US$ per square kilometre against 892,621 current US$ per square kilometre in New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square between Guatemala and New Zealand?
16,356 current US$ per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and New Zealand?
53 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and New Zealand rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square?
Guatemala ranks 80th and New Zealand ranks 82nd of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs New Zealand: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/new-zealand/">Guatemala vs New Zealand: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
243 places, 10,300 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.