French Polynesia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square

French Polynesia
1.39 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2020
Turks and Caicos Islands
1.44 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
French Polynesia rank
65th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
62nd

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square over time

  • French Polynesia
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M200120122023

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 1.44 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.39 million current US$ per square kilometre in French Polynesia, a difference of 50,590 current US$ per square kilometre.

Across all 16 years both countries report, French Polynesia has been ahead every year.

French Polynesia ranks 65th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 62nd of 204 countries.

French Polynesia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade French Polynesia Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 1.60 million current US$ per square kilometre 662,071 current US$ per square kilometre 939,365 current US$ per square kilometre French Polynesia
2010s 1.48 million current US$ per square kilometre 934,429 current US$ per square kilometre 549,611 current US$ per square kilometre French Polynesia
2020s 1.39 million current US$ per square kilometre 841,462 current US$ per square kilometre 547,208 current US$ per square kilometre French Polynesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square, French Polynesia or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 1.44 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.39 million current US$ per square kilometre in French Polynesia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square between French Polynesia and Turks and Caicos Islands?
50,590 current US$ per square kilometre, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Turks and Caicos Islands?
16 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2020.
How do French Polynesia and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square?
French Polynesia ranks 65th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 62nd of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

French Polynesia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-us-per-square-kilometre/french-polynesia/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-us-per-square-kilometre/french-polynesia/turks-and-caicos-islands/">French Polynesia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
243 places, 10,300 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.