Eswatini vs Nepal: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square

Eswatini
249,951 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Nepal
253,832 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
134th
Nepal rank
133rd

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square over time

  • Eswatini
  • Nepal
0100.0k200.0k300.0k196119922023

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 253,832 current US$ per square kilometre against 249,951 current US$ per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 3,881 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Nepal ahead.

Eswatini ranks 134th and Nepal ranks 133rd of 204 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 6 and Nepal in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Nepal Difference Ahead
1960s 3,758 current US$ per square kilometre 4,694 current US$ per square kilometre 936.28 current US$ per square kilometre Nepal
1970s 12,357 current US$ per square kilometre 8,596 current US$ per square kilometre 3,761 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 26,802 current US$ per square kilometre 17,824 current US$ per square kilometre 8,978 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 71,253 current US$ per square kilometre 27,890 current US$ per square kilometre 43,363 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 144,230 current US$ per square kilometre 54,550 current US$ per square kilometre 89,680 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 240,055 current US$ per square kilometre 155,737 current US$ per square kilometre 84,318 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 246,967 current US$ per square kilometre 231,252 current US$ per square kilometre 15,716 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square, Eswatini or Nepal?
Nepal, at 253,832 current US$ per square kilometre against 249,951 current US$ per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square between Eswatini and Nepal?
3,881 current US$ per square kilometre, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Nepal?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Nepal rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square?
Eswatini ranks 134th and Nepal ranks 133rd of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Nepal: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/nepal/">Eswatini vs Nepal: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
243 places, 10,300 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.