Denmark vs Japan: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square

Denmark
8.96 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Japan
11.94 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Denmark rank
28th
Japan rank
25th

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square over time

  • Denmark
  • Japan
05.0M10.0M15.0M196619942023

How they compare

Japan currently reports 11.94 million current US$ per square kilometre against 8.96 million current US$ per square kilometre in Denmark, a difference of 2.98 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Japan's figure about 1.3 times Denmark's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.

Denmark ranks 28th and Japan ranks 25th of 204 countries.

Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Japan Difference Ahead
1970s 856,997 current US$ per square kilometre 1.58 million current US$ per square kilometre 724,497 current US$ per square kilometre Japan
1980s 1.72 million current US$ per square kilometre 5.13 million current US$ per square kilometre 3.42 million current US$ per square kilometre Japan
1990s 3.52 million current US$ per square kilometre 12.29 million current US$ per square kilometre 8.77 million current US$ per square kilometre Japan
2000s 5.41 million current US$ per square kilometre 13.11 million current US$ per square kilometre 7.70 million current US$ per square kilometre Japan
2010s 7.23 million current US$ per square kilometre 14.68 million current US$ per square kilometre 7.45 million current US$ per square kilometre Japan
2020s 8.59 million current US$ per square kilometre 13.12 million current US$ per square kilometre 4.54 million current US$ per square kilometre Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square, Denmark or Japan?
Japan, at 11.94 million current US$ per square kilometre against 8.96 million current US$ per square kilometre in Denmark as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square between Denmark and Japan?
2.98 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Japan?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Denmark and Japan rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square?
Denmark ranks 28th and Japan ranks 25th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Japan: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-us-per-square-kilometre/denmark/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-us-per-square-kilometre/denmark/japan/">Denmark vs Japan: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
243 places, 10,300 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.