Czechia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square

Czechia
4.11 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
4.67 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Czechia rank
39th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
37th

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square over time

  • Czechia
  • Trinidad and Tobago
02.0M4.0M6.0M196619942023

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 4.67 million current US$ per square kilometre against 4.11 million current US$ per square kilometre in Czechia, a difference of 561,700 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Trinidad and Tobago's figure about 1.1 times Czechia's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.

Czechia ranks 39th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 37th of 204 countries.

Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1990s 693,083 current US$ per square kilometre 1.08 million current US$ per square kilometre 387,136 current US$ per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 1.60 million current US$ per square kilometre 2.99 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.39 million current US$ per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 2.56 million current US$ per square kilometre 4.81 million current US$ per square kilometre 2.24 million current US$ per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 3.52 million current US$ per square kilometre 4.60 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.08 million current US$ per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square, Czechia or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 4.67 million current US$ per square kilometre against 4.11 million current US$ per square kilometre in Czechia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square between Czechia and Trinidad and Tobago?
561,700 current US$ per square kilometre, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Trinidad and Tobago?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Czechia and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square?
Czechia ranks 39th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 37th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Czechia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-us-per-square-kilometre/czechia/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-us-per-square-kilometre/czechia/trinidad-and-tobago/">Czechia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
243 places, 10,300 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.