Czechia vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square

Czechia
4.11 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis
3.54 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Czechia rank
39th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
41st

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square over time

  • Czechia
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M197720002023

How they compare

Czechia currently reports 4.11 million current US$ per square kilometre against 3.54 million current US$ per square kilometre in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 568,800 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Czechia's figure about 1.2 times Saint Kitts and Nevis's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Czechia ranks 39th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 41st of 204 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 1 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1990s 693,083 current US$ per square kilometre 1.16 million current US$ per square kilometre 466,213 current US$ per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 1.60 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.95 million current US$ per square kilometre 350,365 current US$ per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 2.56 million current US$ per square kilometre 3.18 million current US$ per square kilometre 615,016 current US$ per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 3.52 million current US$ per square kilometre 3.17 million current US$ per square kilometre 344,308 current US$ per square kilometre Czechia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square, Czechia or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Czechia, at 4.11 million current US$ per square kilometre against 3.54 million current US$ per square kilometre in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square between Czechia and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
568,800 current US$ per square kilometre, with Czechia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Czechia and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square?
Czechia ranks 39th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 41st of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Czechia vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-us-per-square-kilometre/czechia/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-us-per-square-kilometre/czechia/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Czechia vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
243 places, 10,300 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.