Czechia vs Least developed countries: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square

Czechia
4.11 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Least developed countries
68,243 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Czechia rank
39th
Least developed countries rank
36th

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square over time

  • Czechia
  • Least developed countries
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M199020062023

How they compare

Czechia currently reports 4.11 million current US$ per square kilometre against 68,243 current US$ per square kilometre in Least developed countries, a difference of 4.04 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Czechia's figure about 60.2 times Least developed countries's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.

Czechia ranks 39th and Least developed countries ranks 36th of 204 countries.

Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia Least developed countries Difference Ahead
1990s 693,083 current US$ per square kilometre 9,910 current US$ per square kilometre 683,173 current US$ per square kilometre Czechia
2000s 1.60 million current US$ per square kilometre 19,864 current US$ per square kilometre 1.58 million current US$ per square kilometre Czechia
2010s 2.56 million current US$ per square kilometre 45,502 current US$ per square kilometre 2.52 million current US$ per square kilometre Czechia
2020s 3.52 million current US$ per square kilometre 63,350 current US$ per square kilometre 3.45 million current US$ per square kilometre Czechia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square, Czechia or Least developed countries?
Czechia, at 4.11 million current US$ per square kilometre against 68,243 current US$ per square kilometre in Least developed countries as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square between Czechia and Least developed countries?
4.04 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Czechia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Least developed countries?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Czechia and Least developed countries rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square?
Czechia ranks 39th and Least developed countries ranks 36th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Czechia vs Least developed countries: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-us-per-square-kilometre/czechia/least-developed-countries-un-classification/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-us-per-square-kilometre/czechia/least-developed-countries-un-classification/">Czechia vs Least developed countries: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
243 places, 10,300 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.