Curacao vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square

Curacao
6.30 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa
83,267 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Curacao rank
33rd
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
30th

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square over time

  • Curacao
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
02.0M4.0M6.0M198120022023

How they compare

Curacao currently reports 6.30 million current US$ per square kilometre against 83,267 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 6.22 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Curacao's figure about 75.7 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

Across all 13 years both countries report, Curacao has been ahead every year.

Curacao ranks 33rd and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 30th of 204 countries.

Curacao has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Curacao Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
2010s 6.02 million current US$ per square kilometre 70,643 current US$ per square kilometre 5.95 million current US$ per square kilometre Curacao
2020s 5.62 million current US$ per square kilometre 83,553 current US$ per square kilometre 5.54 million current US$ per square kilometre Curacao

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square, Curacao or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Curacao, at 6.30 million current US$ per square kilometre against 83,267 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square between Curacao and Sub-Saharan Africa?
6.22 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Curacao ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Curacao and Sub-Saharan Africa?
13 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2023.
How do Curacao and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square?
Curacao ranks 33rd and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 30th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Curacao vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-us-per-square-kilometre/curacao/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-us-per-square-kilometre/curacao/sub-saharan-africa/">Curacao vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
243 places, 10,300 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.