Curaçao vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square

Curaçao
6.30 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
83,192 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Curaçao rank
33rd
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank
32nd

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square over time

  • Curaçao
  • Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
02.0M4.0M6.0M198120022023

How they compare

Curaçao currently reports 6.30 million current US$ per square kilometre against 83,192 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), a difference of 6.22 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Curaçao's figure about 75.7 times Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 13 years both countries report, Curaçao has been ahead every year.

Curaçao ranks 33rd and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 32nd of 204 countries.

Curaçao has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Curaçao Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) Difference Ahead
2010s 6.02 million current US$ per square kilometre 70,592 current US$ per square kilometre 5.95 million current US$ per square kilometre Curaçao
2020s 5.62 million current US$ per square kilometre 83,492 current US$ per square kilometre 5.54 million current US$ per square kilometre Curaçao

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square, Curaçao or Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
Curaçao, at 6.30 million current US$ per square kilometre against 83,192 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square between Curaçao and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
6.22 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Curaçao ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Curaçao and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
13 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2023.
How do Curaçao and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square?
Curaçao ranks 33rd and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 32nd of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Curaçao vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-us-per-square-kilometre/curacao/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-us-per-square-kilometre/curacao/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/">Curaçao vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
243 places, 10,300 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.