Colombia vs Tunisia: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square

Colombia
298,471 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
296,817 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Colombia rank
124th
Tunisia rank
125th

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square over time

  • Colombia
  • Tunisia
0100.0k200.0k300.0k196119922023

How they compare

Colombia currently reports 298,471 current US$ per square kilometre against 296,817 current US$ per square kilometre in Tunisia, a difference of 1,654 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Tunisia ahead.

Colombia ranks 124th and Tunisia ranks 125th of 204 countries.

Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 5,204 current US$ per square kilometre 6,294 current US$ per square kilometre 1,090 current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1970s 12,831 current US$ per square kilometre 21,558 current US$ per square kilometre 8,727 current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1980s 32,437 current US$ per square kilometre 50,145 current US$ per square kilometre 17,708 current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1990s 65,552 current US$ per square kilometre 98,455 current US$ per square kilometre 32,903 current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2000s 123,256 current US$ per square kilometre 186,279 current US$ per square kilometre 63,022 current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2010s 270,625 current US$ per square kilometre 275,506 current US$ per square kilometre 4,882 current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 265,048 current US$ per square kilometre 278,350 current US$ per square kilometre 13,302 current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square, Colombia or Tunisia?
Colombia, at 298,471 current US$ per square kilometre against 296,817 current US$ per square kilometre in Tunisia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square between Colombia and Tunisia?
1,654 current US$ per square kilometre, with Colombia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Tunisia?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Colombia and Tunisia rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square?
Colombia ranks 124th and Tunisia ranks 125th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs Tunisia: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-us-per-square-kilometre/colombia/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-us-per-square-kilometre/colombia/tunisia/">Colombia vs Tunisia: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
243 places, 10,300 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.