Chile vs Egypt: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square

Chile
406,198 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Egypt
377,784 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
115th
Egypt rank
118th

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square over time

  • Chile
  • Egypt
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 406,198 current US$ per square kilometre against 377,784 current US$ per square kilometre in Egypt, a difference of 28,414 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Egypt's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 115th and Egypt ranks 118th of 204 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 5 and Egypt in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Egypt Difference Ahead
1960s 8,408 current US$ per square kilometre 4,493 current US$ per square kilometre 3,915 current US$ per square kilometre Chile
1970s 17,396 current US$ per square kilometre 10,828 current US$ per square kilometre 6,568 current US$ per square kilometre Chile
1980s 29,536 current US$ per square kilometre 31,638 current US$ per square kilometre 2,102 current US$ per square kilometre Egypt
1990s 73,985 current US$ per square kilometre 56,624 current US$ per square kilometre 17,361 current US$ per square kilometre Chile
2000s 144,900 current US$ per square kilometre 106,174 current US$ per square kilometre 38,726 current US$ per square kilometre Chile
2010s 317,142 current US$ per square kilometre 282,055 current US$ per square kilometre 35,087 current US$ per square kilometre Chile
2020s 364,435 current US$ per square kilometre 401,840 current US$ per square kilometre 37,405 current US$ per square kilometre Egypt

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square, Chile or Egypt?
Chile, at 406,198 current US$ per square kilometre against 377,784 current US$ per square kilometre in Egypt as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square between Chile and Egypt?
28,414 current US$ per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Egypt?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Egypt rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square?
Chile ranks 115th and Egypt ranks 118th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Egypt: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/egypt-arab-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/egypt-arab-rep/">Chile vs Egypt: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
243 places, 10,300 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.