Chagai vs Hong Kong, China: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square

Chagai
56.35 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Hong Kong, China
354.50 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chagai rank
1st
Hong Kong, China rank
4th

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square over time

  • Chagai
  • Hong Kong, China
0100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M200020112023

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 354.50 million current US$ per square kilometre against 56.35 million current US$ per square kilometre in Chagai, a difference of 298.15 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 6.3 times Chagai's.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.

Chagai ranks 1st and Hong Kong, China ranks 4th of 1 regions.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chagai Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
2010s 48.53 million current US$ per square kilometre 317.41 million current US$ per square kilometre 268.87 million current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2020s 52.02 million current US$ per square kilometre 325.40 million current US$ per square kilometre 273.38 million current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square, Chagai or Hong Kong, China?
Hong Kong, China, at 354.50 million current US$ per square kilometre against 56.35 million current US$ per square kilometre in Chagai as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square between Chagai and Hong Kong, China?
298.15 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chagai and Hong Kong, China?
6 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
How do Chagai and Hong Kong, China rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square?
Chagai ranks 1st and Hong Kong, China ranks 4th of 1 regions.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chagai vs Hong Kong, China: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-us-per-square-kilometre/channel-islands/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-us-per-square-kilometre/channel-islands/hong-kong-sar-china/">Chagai vs Hong Kong, China: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
243 places, 10,300 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.