Canada vs Eswatini: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square

Canada
233,197 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini
249,951 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Canada rank
136th
Eswatini rank
134th

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square over time

  • Canada
  • Eswatini
0100.0k200.0k300.0k196119922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 249,951 current US$ per square kilometre against 233,197 current US$ per square kilometre in Canada, a difference of 16,754 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Canada's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Canada ahead.

Canada ranks 136th and Eswatini ranks 134th of 204 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 3 and Eswatini in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 5,923 current US$ per square kilometre 3,758 current US$ per square kilometre 2,164 current US$ per square kilometre Canada
1970s 17,353 current US$ per square kilometre 12,357 current US$ per square kilometre 4,996 current US$ per square kilometre Canada
1980s 40,243 current US$ per square kilometre 26,802 current US$ per square kilometre 13,440 current US$ per square kilometre Canada
1990s 63,749 current US$ per square kilometre 71,253 current US$ per square kilometre 7,503 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 114,966 current US$ per square kilometre 144,230 current US$ per square kilometre 29,264 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 178,151 current US$ per square kilometre 240,055 current US$ per square kilometre 61,904 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 213,774 current US$ per square kilometre 246,967 current US$ per square kilometre 33,194 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square, Canada or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 249,951 current US$ per square kilometre against 233,197 current US$ per square kilometre in Canada as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square between Canada and Eswatini?
16,754 current US$ per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Eswatini?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Canada and Eswatini rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square?
Canada ranks 136th and Eswatini ranks 134th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Eswatini: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-us-per-square-kilometre/canada/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-us-per-square-kilometre/canada/eswatini/">Canada vs Eswatini: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
243 places, 10,300 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.