Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Pakistan: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square

Bosnia and Herzegovina
454,230 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan
415,419 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
111th
Pakistan rank
114th

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Pakistan
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k196119922023

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 454,230 current US$ per square kilometre against 415,419 current US$ per square kilometre in Pakistan, a difference of 38,811 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.1 times Pakistan's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Pakistan ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 111th and Pakistan ranks 114th of 204 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and Pakistan in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Pakistan Difference Ahead
1990s 50,950 current US$ per square kilometre 71,875 current US$ per square kilometre 20,924 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2000s 180,448 current US$ per square kilometre 175,698 current US$ per square kilometre 4,750 current US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 294,550 current US$ per square kilometre 349,397 current US$ per square kilometre 54,848 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2020s 394,205 current US$ per square kilometre 416,798 current US$ per square kilometre 22,592 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Pakistan?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 454,230 current US$ per square kilometre against 415,419 current US$ per square kilometre in Pakistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Pakistan?
38,811 current US$ per square kilometre, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Pakistan?
30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Pakistan rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current us$), per square?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 111th and Pakistan ranks 114th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Pakistan: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/pakistan/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Pakistan: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
243 places, 10,300 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.