Iran vs Viet Nam: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA)
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) over time
- Iran
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Iran currently reports 262,135.00 trillion current LCU against 11,824.50 trillion current LCU in Viet Nam, a difference of 250,310.50 trillion current LCU.
That makes Iran's figure about 22.2 times Viet Nam's.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Iran has been ahead every year.
Iran ranks 1st and Viet Nam ranks 3rd of 206 countries.
Iran has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iran | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 13,480.41 trillion current LCU | 4,687.35 trillion current LCU | 8,793.06 trillion current LCU | Iran |
| 2020s | 141,335.95 trillion current LCU | 9,292.82 trillion current LCU | 132,043.13 trillion current LCU | Iran |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva), Iran or Viet Nam?
- Iran, at 262,135.00 trillion current LCU against 11,824.50 trillion current LCU in Viet Nam as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) between Iran and Viet Nam?
- 250,310.50 trillion current LCU, with Iran ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iran and Viet Nam?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2025.
- How do Iran and Viet Nam rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva)?
- Iran ranks 1st and Viet Nam ranks 3rd of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross value added at basic prices reflects the price of products receivable by the producer exclusive of taxes payable on products and inclusive of subsidies receivable on products, less intermediate consumption valued at purchasers' prices. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.