Greenland vs Malta: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA)
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) over time
- Greenland
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 22.58 billion current LCU against 22.00 billion current LCU in Greenland, a difference of 580.70 million current LCU.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Greenland has been ahead every year.
Greenland ranks 167th and Malta ranks 166th of 206 countries.
Greenland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greenland | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11.47 billion current LCU | 4.81 billion current LCU | 6.66 billion current LCU | Greenland |
| 2010s | 16.22 billion current LCU | 8.92 billion current LCU | 7.29 billion current LCU | Greenland |
| 2020s | 20.71 billion current LCU | 16.15 billion current LCU | 4.56 billion current LCU | Greenland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva), Greenland or Malta?
- Malta, at 22.58 billion current LCU against 22.00 billion current LCU in Greenland as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) between Greenland and Malta?
- 580.70 million current LCU, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and Malta?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2023.
- How do Greenland and Malta rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva)?
- Greenland ranks 167th and Malta ranks 166th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross value added at basic prices reflects the price of products receivable by the producer exclusive of taxes payable on products and inclusive of subsidies receivable on products, less intermediate consumption valued at purchasers' prices. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.