Brazil vs Yemen: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA)
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) over time
- Brazil
- Yemen
How they compare
Yemen currently reports 11.12 trillion current LCU against 10.95 trillion current LCU in Brazil, a difference of 163.60 billion current LCU.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Yemen ahead.
Brazil ranks 56th and Yemen ranks 55th of 206 countries.
Yemen has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Yemen | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 434.12 billion current LCU | 511.72 billion current LCU | 77.60 billion current LCU | Yemen |
| 2000s | 1.82 trillion current LCU | 3.03 trillion current LCU | 1.21 trillion current LCU | Yemen |
| 2010s | 4.77 trillion current LCU | 8.49 trillion current LCU | 3.73 trillion current LCU | Yemen |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva), Brazil or Yemen?
- Yemen, at 11.12 trillion current LCU against 10.95 trillion current LCU in Brazil as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) between Brazil and Yemen?
- 163.60 billion current LCU, with Yemen ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Yemen?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2018.
- How do Brazil and Yemen rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva)?
- Brazil ranks 56th and Yemen ranks 55th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross value added at basic prices reflects the price of products receivable by the producer exclusive of taxes payable on products and inclusive of subsidies receivable on products, less intermediate consumption valued at purchasers' prices. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.