Angola vs Sudan: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA)
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) over time
- Angola
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 133.14 trillion current LCU against 128.14 trillion current LCU in Angola, a difference of 5.00 trillion current LCU.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Angola ahead.
Angola ranks 25th and Sudan ranks 24th of 206 countries.
Angola has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.01 trillion current LCU | 72.46 billion current LCU | 3.94 trillion current LCU | Angola |
| 2010s | 18.47 trillion current LCU | 665.16 billion current LCU | 17.80 trillion current LCU | Angola |
| 2020s | 77.17 trillion current LCU | 47.26 trillion current LCU | 29.91 trillion current LCU | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva), Angola or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 133.14 trillion current LCU against 128.14 trillion current LCU in Angola as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) between Angola and Sudan?
- 5.00 trillion current LCU, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Sudan?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2025.
- How do Angola and Sudan rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva)?
- Angola ranks 25th and Sudan ranks 24th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross value added at basic prices reflects the price of products receivable by the producer exclusive of taxes payable on products and inclusive of subsidies receivable on products, less intermediate consumption valued at purchasers' prices. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.