Pakistan vs Togo: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square

Pakistan
103.21 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Togo
98.48 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan rank
42nd
Togo rank
43rd

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square over time

  • Pakistan
  • Togo
025.0M50.0M75.0M100.0M196119922023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 103.21 million current LCU per square kilometre against 98.48 million current LCU per square kilometre in Togo, a difference of 4.73 million current LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 61 shared years of data; in 1963 it was Togo ahead.

Pakistan ranks 42nd and Togo ranks 43rd of 204 countries.

Togo has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pakistan Togo Difference Ahead
1960s 37,944 current LCU per square kilometre 1.25 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.22 million current LCU per square kilometre Togo
1970s 127,024 current LCU per square kilometre 3.05 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.92 million current LCU per square kilometre Togo
1980s 537,564 current LCU per square kilometre 7.69 million current LCU per square kilometre 7.15 million current LCU per square kilometre Togo
1990s 2.13 million current LCU per square kilometre 15.89 million current LCU per square kilometre 13.76 million current LCU per square kilometre Togo
2000s 10.87 million current LCU per square kilometre 30.22 million current LCU per square kilometre 19.35 million current LCU per square kilometre Togo
2010s 36.06 million current LCU per square kilometre 54.75 million current LCU per square kilometre 18.69 million current LCU per square kilometre Togo
2020s 77.79 million current LCU per square kilometre 84.86 million current LCU per square kilometre 7.07 million current LCU per square kilometre Togo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current lcu), per square, Pakistan or Togo?
Pakistan, at 103.21 million current LCU per square kilometre against 98.48 million current LCU per square kilometre in Togo as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current lcu), per square between Pakistan and Togo?
4.73 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Togo?
61 years are reported by both, from 1963 to 2023.
How do Pakistan and Togo rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current lcu), per square?
Pakistan ranks 42nd and Togo ranks 43rd of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pakistan vs Togo: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/pakistan/togo/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/pakistan/togo/">Pakistan vs Togo: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 8,532 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.