Oman vs Zimbabwe: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square

Oman
132,693 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
164,708 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Oman rank
200th
Zimbabwe rank
198th

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square over time

  • Oman
  • Zimbabwe
050.0k100.0k150.0k196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 164,708 current LCU per square kilometre against 132,693 current LCU per square kilometre in Oman, a difference of 32,015 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Oman's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Oman ahead.

Oman ranks 200th and Zimbabwe ranks 198th of 204 countries.

Oman has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Oman Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 121.16 current LCU per square kilometre 1.29 current LCU per square kilometre 119.87 current LCU per square kilometre Oman
1970s 1,897 current LCU per square kilometre 3.68 current LCU per square kilometre 1,894 current LCU per square kilometre Oman
1980s 6,637 current LCU per square kilometre 6.64 current LCU per square kilometre 6,631 current LCU per square kilometre Oman
1990s 18,827 current LCU per square kilometre 6.87 current LCU per square kilometre 18,820 current LCU per square kilometre Oman
2000s 46,092 current LCU per square kilometre 5.83 current LCU per square kilometre 46,086 current LCU per square kilometre Oman
2010s 105,438 current LCU per square kilometre 56.61 current LCU per square kilometre 105,381 current LCU per square kilometre Oman
2020s 119,200 current LCU per square kilometre 47,240 current LCU per square kilometre 71,960 current LCU per square kilometre Oman

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current lcu), per square, Oman or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 164,708 current LCU per square kilometre against 132,693 current LCU per square kilometre in Oman as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current lcu), per square between Oman and Zimbabwe?
32,015 current LCU per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Zimbabwe?
54 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Oman and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current lcu), per square?
Oman ranks 200th and Zimbabwe ranks 198th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Oman vs Zimbabwe: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/oman/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/oman/zimbabwe/">Oman vs Zimbabwe: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 8,532 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.