Iceland vs Nepal: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square

Iceland
38.85 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Nepal
33.19 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland rank
70th
Nepal rank
72nd

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square over time

  • Iceland
  • Nepal
010.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M196119922023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 38.85 million current LCU per square kilometre against 33.19 million current LCU per square kilometre in Nepal, a difference of 5.67 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.2 times Nepal's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 51 shared years of data; in 1973 it was Nepal ahead.

Iceland ranks 70th and Nepal ranks 72nd of 204 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 5 and Nepal in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Nepal Difference Ahead
1970s 36,080 current LCU per square kilometre 110,065 current LCU per square kilometre 73,985 current LCU per square kilometre Nepal
1980s 1.20 million current LCU per square kilometre 320,885 current LCU per square kilometre 880,505 current LCU per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 4.28 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.41 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.87 million current LCU per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 9.82 million current LCU per square kilometre 3.95 million current LCU per square kilometre 5.87 million current LCU per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 20.51 million current LCU per square kilometre 15.03 million current LCU per square kilometre 5.48 million current LCU per square kilometre Iceland
2020s 32.61 million current LCU per square kilometre 28.18 million current LCU per square kilometre 4.43 million current LCU per square kilometre Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current lcu), per square, Iceland or Nepal?
Iceland, at 38.85 million current LCU per square kilometre against 33.19 million current LCU per square kilometre in Nepal as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current lcu), per square between Iceland and Nepal?
5.67 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Nepal?
51 years are reported by both, from 1973 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Nepal rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current lcu), per square?
Iceland ranks 70th and Nepal ranks 72nd of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Nepal: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/iceland/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/iceland/nepal/">Iceland vs Nepal: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 8,532 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.