Hong Kong, China vs Indonesia: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square

Hong Kong, China
2.78 billion current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Indonesia
10.56 billion current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong, China rank
8th
Indonesia rank
6th

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Indonesia
2.0B4.0B6.0B8.0B10.0B200020112023

How they compare

Indonesia currently reports 10.56 billion current LCU per square kilometre against 2.78 billion current LCU per square kilometre in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 7.78 billion current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Indonesia's figure about 3.8 times Hong Kong, China's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Indonesia has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong, China ranks 8th and Indonesia ranks 6th of 204 countries.

Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Indonesia Difference Ahead
2010s 2.16 billion current LCU per square kilometre 5.75 billion current LCU per square kilometre 3.59 billion current LCU per square kilometre Indonesia
2020s 2.61 billion current LCU per square kilometre 9.25 billion current LCU per square kilometre 6.64 billion current LCU per square kilometre Indonesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current lcu), per square, Hong Kong, China or Indonesia?
Indonesia, at 10.56 billion current LCU per square kilometre against 2.78 billion current LCU per square kilometre in Hong Kong, China as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current lcu), per square between Hong Kong, China and Indonesia?
7.78 billion current LCU per square kilometre, with Indonesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Indonesia?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Hong Kong, China and Indonesia rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current lcu), per square?
Hong Kong, China ranks 8th and Indonesia ranks 6th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Indonesia: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/indonesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/indonesia/">Hong Kong, China vs Indonesia: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 8,532 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.