Eswatini vs France: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square

Eswatini
4.61 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
France
4.71 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
134th
France rank
133rd

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square over time

  • Eswatini
  • France
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M5.0M196119922023

How they compare

France currently reports 4.71 million current LCU per square kilometre against 4.61 million current LCU per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 97,490 current LCU per square kilometre.

Across all 63 years both countries report, France has been ahead every year.

Eswatini ranks 134th and France ranks 133rd of 204 countries.

France has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini France Difference Ahead
1960s 2,684 current LCU per square kilometre 125,851 current LCU per square kilometre 123,166 current LCU per square kilometre France
1970s 9,785 current LCU per square kilometre 387,232 current LCU per square kilometre 377,446 current LCU per square kilometre France
1980s 45,503 current LCU per square kilometre 1.19 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.14 million current LCU per square kilometre France
1990s 286,298 current LCU per square kilometre 2.00 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.71 million current LCU per square kilometre France
2000s 1.09 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.89 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.81 million current LCU per square kilometre France
2010s 2.66 million current LCU per square kilometre 3.62 million current LCU per square kilometre 965,497 current LCU per square kilometre France
2020s 4.08 million current LCU per square kilometre 4.26 million current LCU per square kilometre 181,568 current LCU per square kilometre France

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current lcu), per square, Eswatini or France?
France, at 4.71 million current LCU per square kilometre against 4.61 million current LCU per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current lcu), per square between Eswatini and France?
97,490 current LCU per square kilometre, with France ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and France?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and France rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current lcu), per square?
Eswatini ranks 134th and France ranks 133rd of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs France: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/france/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/france/">Eswatini vs France: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 8,532 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.