Brunei vs Eswatini: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square

Brunei
3.91 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini
4.61 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Brunei rank
135th
Eswatini rank
134th

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square over time

  • Brunei
  • Eswatini
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M5.0M196119922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 4.61 million current LCU per square kilometre against 3.91 million current LCU per square kilometre in Brunei, a difference of 698,020 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.2 times Brunei's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1974 it was Brunei ahead.

Brunei ranks 135th and Eswatini ranks 134th of 204 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Brunei averaged higher in 5 and Eswatini in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brunei Eswatini Difference Ahead
1970s 1.63 million current LCU per square kilometre 12,430 current LCU per square kilometre 1.62 million current LCU per square kilometre Brunei
1980s 2.88 million current LCU per square kilometre 45,503 current LCU per square kilometre 2.83 million current LCU per square kilometre Brunei
1990s 2.04 million current LCU per square kilometre 286,298 current LCU per square kilometre 1.75 million current LCU per square kilometre Brunei
2000s 3.06 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.09 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.98 million current LCU per square kilometre Brunei
2010s 3.80 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.66 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.14 million current LCU per square kilometre Brunei
2020s 3.79 million current LCU per square kilometre 4.08 million current LCU per square kilometre 281,362 current LCU per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current lcu), per square, Brunei or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 4.61 million current LCU per square kilometre against 3.91 million current LCU per square kilometre in Brunei as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current lcu), per square between Brunei and Eswatini?
698,020 current LCU per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei and Eswatini?
50 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2023.
How do Brunei and Eswatini rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current lcu), per square?
Brunei ranks 135th and Eswatini ranks 134th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brunei vs Eswatini: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/brunei-darussalam/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/brunei-darussalam/eswatini/">Brunei vs Eswatini: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 8,532 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.