Brazil vs Lesotho: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square

Brazil
1.14 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Lesotho
1.11 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
163rd
Lesotho rank
164th

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square over time

  • Brazil
  • Lesotho
0250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M1.2M196119922023

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 1.14 million current LCU per square kilometre against 1.11 million current LCU per square kilometre in Lesotho, a difference of 34,610 current LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Lesotho ahead.

Brazil ranks 163rd and Lesotho ranks 164th of 204 countries.

Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Lesotho Difference Ahead
1960s 0 current LCU per square kilometre 1,168 current LCU per square kilometre 1,168 current LCU per square kilometre Lesotho
1970s 0 current LCU per square kilometre 3,526 current LCU per square kilometre 3,526 current LCU per square kilometre Lesotho
1980s 0.0055 current LCU per square kilometre 19,640 current LCU per square kilometre 19,640 current LCU per square kilometre Lesotho
1990s 51,939 current LCU per square kilometre 106,539 current LCU per square kilometre 54,600 current LCU per square kilometre Lesotho
2000s 218,261 current LCU per square kilometre 314,581 current LCU per square kilometre 96,320 current LCU per square kilometre Lesotho
2010s 589,356 current LCU per square kilometre 774,000 current LCU per square kilometre 184,643 current LCU per square kilometre Lesotho
2020s 975,219 current LCU per square kilometre 1.06 million current LCU per square kilometre 79,875 current LCU per square kilometre Lesotho

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current lcu), per square, Brazil or Lesotho?
Brazil, at 1.14 million current LCU per square kilometre against 1.11 million current LCU per square kilometre in Lesotho as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current lcu), per square between Brazil and Lesotho?
34,610 current LCU per square kilometre, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Lesotho?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Lesotho rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current lcu), per square?
Brazil ranks 163rd and Lesotho ranks 164th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Lesotho: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/brazil/lesotho/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/brazil/lesotho/">Brazil vs Lesotho: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 8,532 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.