Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Tajikistan: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square

Bosnia and Herzegovina
821,793 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Tajikistan
861,626 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
172nd
Tajikistan rank
171st

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Tajikistan
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k199220072023

How they compare

Tajikistan currently reports 861,626 current LCU per square kilometre against 821,793 current LCU per square kilometre in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 39,833 current LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 172nd and Tajikistan ranks 171st of 204 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 3 and Tajikistan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Tajikistan Difference Ahead
1990s 85,905 current LCU per square kilometre 3,610 current LCU per square kilometre 82,295 current LCU per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2000s 286,528 current LCU per square kilometre 54,600 current LCU per square kilometre 231,928 current LCU per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 472,291 current LCU per square kilometre 317,875 current LCU per square kilometre 154,415 current LCU per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 695,506 current LCU per square kilometre 711,280 current LCU per square kilometre 15,774 current LCU per square kilometre Tajikistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current lcu), per square, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Tajikistan?
Tajikistan, at 861,626 current LCU per square kilometre against 821,793 current LCU per square kilometre in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current lcu), per square between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Tajikistan?
39,833 current LCU per square kilometre, with Tajikistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Tajikistan?
30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Tajikistan rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current lcu), per square?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 172nd and Tajikistan ranks 171st of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Tajikistan: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/tajikistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/tajikistan/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Tajikistan: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 8,532 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.