Bolivia vs Mauritania: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square

Bolivia
310,092 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritania
353,624 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Bolivia rank
193rd
Mauritania rank
190th

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square over time

  • Bolivia
  • Mauritania
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k196119922023

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 353,624 current LCU per square kilometre against 310,092 current LCU per square kilometre in Bolivia, a difference of 43,532 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.1 times Bolivia's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Mauritania ahead.

Bolivia ranks 193rd and Mauritania ranks 190th of 204 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Bolivia averaged higher in 1 and Mauritania in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia Mauritania Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0393 current LCU per square kilometre 2,619 current LCU per square kilometre 2,619 current LCU per square kilometre Mauritania
1980s 3,599 current LCU per square kilometre 7,064 current LCU per square kilometre 3,466 current LCU per square kilometre Mauritania
1990s 25,605 current LCU per square kilometre 24,028 current LCU per square kilometre 1,577 current LCU per square kilometre Bolivia
2000s 61,162 current LCU per square kilometre 72,788 current LCU per square kilometre 11,626 current LCU per square kilometre Mauritania
2010s 182,480 current LCU per square kilometre 194,807 current LCU per square kilometre 12,327 current LCU per square kilometre Mauritania
2020s 286,137 current LCU per square kilometre 312,756 current LCU per square kilometre 26,619 current LCU per square kilometre Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current lcu), per square, Bolivia or Mauritania?
Mauritania, at 353,624 current LCU per square kilometre against 310,092 current LCU per square kilometre in Bolivia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current lcu), per square between Bolivia and Mauritania?
43,532 current LCU per square kilometre, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Mauritania?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Bolivia and Mauritania rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current lcu), per square?
Bolivia ranks 193rd and Mauritania ranks 190th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia vs Mauritania: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/bolivia/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/bolivia/mauritania/">Bolivia vs Mauritania: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 8,532 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.