Austria vs Eswatini: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square

Austria
5.21 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini
4.61 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Austria rank
131st
Eswatini rank
134th

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square over time

  • Austria
  • Eswatini
02.0M4.0M6.0M196119922023

How they compare

Austria currently reports 5.21 million current LCU per square kilometre against 4.61 million current LCU per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 593,920 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Austria's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Austria has been ahead every year.

Austria ranks 131st and Eswatini ranks 134th of 204 countries.

Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Eswatini Difference Ahead
1970s 532,518 current LCU per square kilometre 9,785 current LCU per square kilometre 522,732 current LCU per square kilometre Austria
1980s 1.09 million current LCU per square kilometre 45,503 current LCU per square kilometre 1.04 million current LCU per square kilometre Austria
1990s 1.85 million current LCU per square kilometre 286,298 current LCU per square kilometre 1.56 million current LCU per square kilometre Austria
2000s 2.71 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.09 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.62 million current LCU per square kilometre Austria
2010s 3.68 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.66 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.02 million current LCU per square kilometre Austria
2020s 4.65 million current LCU per square kilometre 4.08 million current LCU per square kilometre 576,775 current LCU per square kilometre Austria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current lcu), per square, Austria or Eswatini?
Austria, at 5.21 million current LCU per square kilometre against 4.61 million current LCU per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current lcu), per square between Austria and Eswatini?
593,920 current LCU per square kilometre, with Austria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Eswatini?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Austria and Eswatini rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (current lcu), per square?
Austria ranks 131st and Eswatini ranks 134th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs Eswatini: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/austria/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/austria/eswatini/">Austria vs Eswatini: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 8,532 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.