Kenya vs Niger: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA)
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) over time
- Kenya
- Niger
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 10.47 trillion constant LCU against 9.60 trillion constant LCU in Niger, a difference of 871.14 billion constant LCU.
That makes Kenya's figure about 1.1 times Niger's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Kenya has been ahead every year.
Kenya ranks 40th and Niger ranks 43rd of 197 countries.
Kenya has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Niger | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.75 trillion constant LCU | 3.51 trillion constant LCU | 1.23 trillion constant LCU | Kenya |
| 2010s | 6.54 trillion constant LCU | 5.27 trillion constant LCU | 1.26 trillion constant LCU | Kenya |
| 2020s | 9.27 trillion constant LCU | 8.13 trillion constant LCU | 1.14 trillion constant LCU | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva), Kenya or Niger?
- Kenya, at 10.47 trillion constant LCU against 9.60 trillion constant LCU in Niger as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) between Kenya and Niger?
- 871.14 billion constant LCU, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Niger?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
- How do Kenya and Niger rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva)?
- Kenya ranks 40th and Niger ranks 43rd of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross value added at basic prices reflects the price of products receivable by the producer exclusive of taxes payable on products and inclusive of subsidies receivable on products, less intermediate consumption valued at purchasers' prices. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.