Japan vs Viet Nam: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA)
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) over time
- Japan
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 6,174.33 trillion constant LCU against 587.58 trillion constant LCU in Japan, a difference of 5,586.75 trillion constant LCU.
That makes Viet Nam's figure about 10.5 times Japan's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Viet Nam has been ahead every year.
Japan ranks 6th and Viet Nam ranks 3rd of 197 countries.
Viet Nam has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 555.84 trillion constant LCU | 3,305.70 trillion constant LCU | 2,749.86 trillion constant LCU | Viet Nam |
| 2020s | 578.66 trillion constant LCU | 5,056.75 trillion constant LCU | 4,478.08 trillion constant LCU | Viet Nam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva), Japan or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 6,174.33 trillion constant LCU against 587.58 trillion constant LCU in Japan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) between Japan and Viet Nam?
- 5,586.75 trillion constant LCU, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Viet Nam?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Japan and Viet Nam rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva)?
- Japan ranks 6th and Viet Nam ranks 3rd of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross value added at basic prices reflects the price of products receivable by the producer exclusive of taxes payable on products and inclusive of subsidies receivable on products, less intermediate consumption valued at purchasers' prices. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.