Algeria vs Chad: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA)
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) over time
- Algeria
- Chad
How they compare
Chad currently reports 9.96 trillion constant LCU against 8.69 trillion constant LCU in Algeria, a difference of 1.27 trillion constant LCU.
That makes Chad's figure about 1.1 times Algeria's.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Chad has been ahead every year.
Algeria ranks 44th and Chad ranks 42nd of 197 countries.
Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Algeria | Chad | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.49 trillion constant LCU | 5.66 trillion constant LCU | 166.00 billion constant LCU | Chad |
| 2010s | 6.79 trillion constant LCU | 7.57 trillion constant LCU | 778.28 billion constant LCU | Chad |
| 2020s | 7.94 trillion constant LCU | 8.95 trillion constant LCU | 1.01 trillion constant LCU | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva), Algeria or Chad?
- Chad, at 9.96 trillion constant LCU against 8.69 trillion constant LCU in Algeria as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) between Algeria and Chad?
- 1.27 trillion constant LCU, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Chad?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Algeria and Chad rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva)?
- Algeria ranks 44th and Chad ranks 42nd of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross value added at basic prices reflects the price of products receivable by the producer exclusive of taxes payable on products and inclusive of subsidies receivable on products, less intermediate consumption valued at purchasers' prices. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.