Botswana vs South Africa: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per unit of

Botswana
9.47 constant LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2025
South Africa
9.97 constant LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Botswana rank
85th
South Africa rank
82nd

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per unit of over time

  • Botswana
  • South Africa
020406080196019922025

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 9.97 constant LCU per US$ of GDP against 9.47 constant LCU per US$ of GDP in Botswana, a difference of 0.5 constant LCU per US$ of GDP.

That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was South Africa ahead.

Botswana ranks 85th and South Africa ranks 82nd of 196 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 4 and South Africa in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana South Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 67.33 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 79.4 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 12.07 constant LCU per US$ of GDP South Africa
1970s 38.04 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 43.42 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 5.38 constant LCU per US$ of GDP South Africa
1980s 22.93 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 22.5 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.4307 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Botswana
1990s 16.21 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 14.67 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 1.54 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Botswana
2000s 13.8 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 13.61 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.185 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Botswana
2010s 10.09 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 10.07 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.0176 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Botswana
2020s 9.88 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 10.48 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.5991 constant LCU per US$ of GDP South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per unit of, Botswana or South Africa?
South Africa, at 9.97 constant LCU per US$ of GDP against 9.47 constant LCU per US$ of GDP in Botswana as of 2025.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per unit of between Botswana and South Africa?
0.5 constant LCU per US$ of GDP, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and South Africa?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Botswana and South Africa rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per unit of?
Botswana ranks 85th and South Africa ranks 82nd of 196 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs South Africa: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per unit of. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-lcu-per-unit-of-gdp/botswana/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-lcu-per-unit-of-gdp/botswana/south-africa/">Botswana vs South Africa: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per unit of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant LCU per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
197 places, 8,292 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.