Barbados vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per unit of

Barbados
1.71 constant LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Saint Kitts and Nevis
1.75 constant LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Barbados rank
126th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
123rd

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per unit of over time

  • Barbados
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
2.557.51012.515197520002025

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 1.75 constant LCU per US$ of GDP against 1.71 constant LCU per US$ of GDP in Barbados, a difference of 0.04 constant LCU per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 126th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 123rd of 196 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 5 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1970s 11.47 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 8.14 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 3.33 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Barbados
1980s 5.28 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 5.26 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.013 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Barbados
1990s 3.42 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 3.31 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.1074 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Barbados
2000s 2.86 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 2.58 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.2814 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Barbados
2010s 2.12 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 1.92 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.2061 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Barbados
2020s 1.81 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 1.88 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.0669 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per unit of, Barbados or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 1.75 constant LCU per US$ of GDP against 1.71 constant LCU per US$ of GDP in Barbados as of 2025.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per unit of between Barbados and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.04 constant LCU per US$ of GDP, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
49 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2025.
How do Barbados and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per unit of?
Barbados ranks 126th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 123rd of 196 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per unit of. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-lcu-per-unit-of-gdp/barbados/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-lcu-per-unit-of-gdp/barbados/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Barbados vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per unit of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant LCU per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
197 places, 8,292 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.