Timor-Leste vs Zimbabwe: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square

Timor-Leste
120,371 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
164,708 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Timor-Leste rank
187th
Zimbabwe rank
184th

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square over time

  • Timor-Leste
  • Zimbabwe
50.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k196519942023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 164,708 constant LCU per square kilometre against 120,371 constant LCU per square kilometre in Timor-Leste, a difference of 44,337 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.4 times Timor-Leste's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Timor-Leste ranks 187th and Zimbabwe ranks 184th of 195 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Timor-Leste averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Timor-Leste Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 63,135 constant LCU per square kilometre 94,606 constant LCU per square kilometre 31,471 constant LCU per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 103,584 constant LCU per square kilometre 130,524 constant LCU per square kilometre 26,940 constant LCU per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 156,266 constant LCU per square kilometre 150,841 constant LCU per square kilometre 5,426 constant LCU per square kilometre Timor-Leste

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per square, Timor-Leste or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 164,708 constant LCU per square kilometre against 120,371 constant LCU per square kilometre in Timor-Leste as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per square between Timor-Leste and Zimbabwe?
44,337 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Timor-Leste and Zimbabwe?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Timor-Leste and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per square?
Timor-Leste ranks 187th and Zimbabwe ranks 184th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Timor-Leste vs Zimbabwe: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/timor-leste/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/timor-leste/zimbabwe/">Timor-Leste vs Zimbabwe: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
196 places, 7,796 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.