Norway vs Sweden: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square

Norway
9.58 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden
11.70 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway rank
85th
Sweden rank
83rd

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square over time

  • Norway
  • Sweden
2.0M4.0M6.0M8.0M10.0M12.0M197019962023

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 11.70 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 9.58 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Norway, a difference of 2.13 million constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Sweden's figure about 1.2 times Norway's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.

Norway ranks 85th and Sweden ranks 83rd of 195 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Norway Sweden Difference Ahead
1970s 2.67 million constant LCU per square kilometre 4.22 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.55 million constant LCU per square kilometre Sweden
1980s 3.92 million constant LCU per square kilometre 5.30 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.39 million constant LCU per square kilometre Sweden
1990s 5.35 million constant LCU per square kilometre 6.25 million constant LCU per square kilometre 906,761 constant LCU per square kilometre Sweden
2000s 7.06 million constant LCU per square kilometre 8.36 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.30 million constant LCU per square kilometre Sweden
2010s 8.22 million constant LCU per square kilometre 10.12 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.90 million constant LCU per square kilometre Sweden
2020s 9.25 million constant LCU per square kilometre 11.44 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.19 million constant LCU per square kilometre Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per square, Norway or Sweden?
Sweden, at 11.70 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 9.58 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Norway as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per square between Norway and Sweden?
2.13 million constant LCU per square kilometre, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Sweden?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Norway and Sweden rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per square?
Norway ranks 85th and Sweden ranks 83rd of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Norway vs Sweden: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/norway/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/norway/sweden/">Norway vs Sweden: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
196 places, 7,796 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.