Namibia vs Zimbabwe: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square

Namibia
168,719 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
164,708 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia rank
183rd
Zimbabwe rank
184th

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square over time

  • Namibia
  • Zimbabwe
50.0k100.0k150.0k196519942023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 168,719 constant LCU per square kilometre against 164,708 constant LCU per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 4,011 constant LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 44 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Namibia ranks 183rd and Zimbabwe ranks 184th of 195 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1980s 52,975 constant LCU per square kilometre 84,570 constant LCU per square kilometre 31,595 constant LCU per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 69,112 constant LCU per square kilometre 115,311 constant LCU per square kilometre 46,198 constant LCU per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 101,400 constant LCU per square kilometre 94,606 constant LCU per square kilometre 6,795 constant LCU per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 152,329 constant LCU per square kilometre 130,524 constant LCU per square kilometre 21,806 constant LCU per square kilometre Namibia
2020s 159,460 constant LCU per square kilometre 150,841 constant LCU per square kilometre 8,619 constant LCU per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per square, Namibia or Zimbabwe?
Namibia, at 168,719 constant LCU per square kilometre against 164,708 constant LCU per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per square between Namibia and Zimbabwe?
4,011 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Zimbabwe?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Namibia and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per square?
Namibia ranks 183rd and Zimbabwe ranks 184th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Zimbabwe: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/namibia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/namibia/zimbabwe/">Namibia vs Zimbabwe: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
196 places, 7,796 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.