Mexico vs Norway: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square

Mexico
12.16 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway
9.58 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico rank
82nd
Norway rank
85th

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square over time

  • Mexico
  • Norway
2.5M5.0M7.5M10.0M12.5M196519942023

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 12.16 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 9.58 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Norway, a difference of 2.58 million constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Mexico's figure about 1.3 times Norway's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.

Mexico ranks 82nd and Norway ranks 85th of 195 countries.

Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Norway Difference Ahead
1970s 3.57 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.67 million constant LCU per square kilometre 903,694 constant LCU per square kilometre Mexico
1980s 5.51 million constant LCU per square kilometre 3.92 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.59 million constant LCU per square kilometre Mexico
1990s 7.02 million constant LCU per square kilometre 5.35 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.67 million constant LCU per square kilometre Mexico
2000s 9.10 million constant LCU per square kilometre 7.06 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.04 million constant LCU per square kilometre Mexico
2010s 10.93 million constant LCU per square kilometre 8.22 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.71 million constant LCU per square kilometre Mexico
2020s 11.53 million constant LCU per square kilometre 9.25 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.28 million constant LCU per square kilometre Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per square, Mexico or Norway?
Mexico, at 12.16 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 9.58 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Norway as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per square between Mexico and Norway?
2.58 million constant LCU per square kilometre, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Norway?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Mexico and Norway rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per square?
Mexico ranks 82nd and Norway ranks 85th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs Norway: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/mexico/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/mexico/norway/">Mexico vs Norway: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
196 places, 7,796 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.