Eswatini vs France: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square

Eswatini
3.81 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
France
4.27 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
114th
France rank
112th

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square over time

  • Eswatini
  • France
1.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M196119922023

How they compare

France currently reports 4.27 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 3.81 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 463,350 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes France's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.

Across all 53 years both countries report, France has been ahead every year.

Eswatini ranks 114th and France ranks 112th of 195 countries.

France has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini France Difference Ahead
1970s 609,115 constant LCU per square kilometre 1.73 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.12 million constant LCU per square kilometre France
1980s 933,667 constant LCU per square kilometre 2.19 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.25 million constant LCU per square kilometre France
1990s 1.82 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.75 million constant LCU per square kilometre 930,519 constant LCU per square kilometre France
2000s 2.32 million constant LCU per square kilometre 3.44 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.12 million constant LCU per square kilometre France
2010s 3.18 million constant LCU per square kilometre 3.86 million constant LCU per square kilometre 685,794 constant LCU per square kilometre France
2020s 3.67 million constant LCU per square kilometre 4.08 million constant LCU per square kilometre 412,765 constant LCU per square kilometre France

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per square, Eswatini or France?
France, at 4.27 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 3.81 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per square between Eswatini and France?
463,350 constant LCU per square kilometre, with France ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and France?
53 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and France rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per square?
Eswatini ranks 114th and France ranks 112th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs France: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/france/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/france/">Eswatini vs France: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
196 places, 7,796 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.