Eritrea vs Timor-Leste: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square
Eritrea
59,162 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2009
Timor-Leste
120,371 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Eritrea rank
190th
Timor-Leste rank
187th
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square over time
- Eritrea
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Timor-Leste currently reports 120,371 constant LCU per square kilometre against 59,162 constant LCU per square kilometre in Eritrea, a difference of 61,209 constant LCU per square kilometre.
That makes Timor-Leste's figure about 2.0 times Eritrea's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 190th and Timor-Leste ranks 187th of 195 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per square, Eritrea or Timor-Leste?
- Timor-Leste, at 120,371 constant LCU per square kilometre against 59,162 constant LCU per square kilometre in Eritrea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per square between Eritrea and Timor-Leste?
- 61,209 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Timor-Leste ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Timor-Leste?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2009.
- How do Eritrea and Timor-Leste rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per square?
- Eritrea ranks 190th and Timor-Leste ranks 187th of 195 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.