Ecuador vs Latvia: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square

Ecuador
439,821 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia
442,544 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
166th
Latvia rank
164th

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square over time

  • Ecuador
  • Latvia
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k196119922023

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 442,544 constant LCU per square kilometre against 439,821 constant LCU per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 2,723 constant LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Latvia ahead.

Ecuador ranks 166th and Latvia ranks 164th of 195 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 174,722 constant LCU per square kilometre 184,874 constant LCU per square kilometre 10,152 constant LCU per square kilometre Latvia
2000s 237,787 constant LCU per square kilometre 309,630 constant LCU per square kilometre 71,843 constant LCU per square kilometre Latvia
2010s 369,860 constant LCU per square kilometre 377,904 constant LCU per square kilometre 8,043 constant LCU per square kilometre Latvia
2020s 414,099 constant LCU per square kilometre 433,111 constant LCU per square kilometre 19,012 constant LCU per square kilometre Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per square, Ecuador or Latvia?
Latvia, at 442,544 constant LCU per square kilometre against 439,821 constant LCU per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per square between Ecuador and Latvia?
2,723 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Latvia?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Latvia rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per square?
Ecuador ranks 166th and Latvia ranks 164th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Latvia: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/latvia/">Ecuador vs Latvia: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
196 places, 7,796 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.