Cuba vs Latvia: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square

Cuba
490,530 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia
442,544 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
161st
Latvia rank
164th

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square over time

  • Cuba
  • Latvia
100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k197019962023

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 490,530 constant LCU per square kilometre against 442,544 constant LCU per square kilometre in Latvia, a difference of 47,986 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.

Across all 29 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.

Cuba ranks 161st and Latvia ranks 164th of 195 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 230,041 constant LCU per square kilometre 184,874 constant LCU per square kilometre 45,167 constant LCU per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 338,102 constant LCU per square kilometre 309,630 constant LCU per square kilometre 28,473 constant LCU per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 500,428 constant LCU per square kilometre 377,904 constant LCU per square kilometre 122,525 constant LCU per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 491,387 constant LCU per square kilometre 433,111 constant LCU per square kilometre 58,276 constant LCU per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per square, Cuba or Latvia?
Cuba, at 490,530 constant LCU per square kilometre against 442,544 constant LCU per square kilometre in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per square between Cuba and Latvia?
47,986 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Latvia?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Latvia rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per square?
Cuba ranks 161st and Latvia ranks 164th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Latvia: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/cuba/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/cuba/latvia/">Cuba vs Latvia: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
196 places, 7,796 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.