Costa Rica vs Rwanda: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square

Costa Rica
869.97 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
716.06 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
10th
Rwanda rank
13th

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Rwanda
0200.0M400.0M600.0M800.0M196119922023

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 869.97 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 716.06 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 153.91 million constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.2 times Rwanda's.

Across all 41 years both countries report, Costa Rica has been ahead every year.

Costa Rica ranks 10th and Rwanda ranks 13th of 195 countries.

Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Rwanda Difference Ahead
1980s 189.30 million constant LCU per square kilometre 122.36 million constant LCU per square kilometre 66.94 million constant LCU per square kilometre Costa Rica
1990s 277.98 million constant LCU per square kilometre 108.88 million constant LCU per square kilometre 169.10 million constant LCU per square kilometre Costa Rica
2000s 432.91 million constant LCU per square kilometre 202.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre 230.68 million constant LCU per square kilometre Costa Rica
2010s 653.03 million constant LCU per square kilometre 422.00 million constant LCU per square kilometre 231.04 million constant LCU per square kilometre Costa Rica
2020s 804.97 million constant LCU per square kilometre 628.88 million constant LCU per square kilometre 176.09 million constant LCU per square kilometre Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per square, Costa Rica or Rwanda?
Costa Rica, at 869.97 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 716.06 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per square between Costa Rica and Rwanda?
153.91 million constant LCU per square kilometre, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Rwanda?
41 years are reported by both, from 1983 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Rwanda rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per square?
Costa Rica ranks 10th and Rwanda ranks 13th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Rwanda: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/rwanda/">Costa Rica vs Rwanda: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
196 places, 7,796 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.