Colombia vs Rwanda: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square

Colombia
793.90 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
716.06 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Colombia rank
11th
Rwanda rank
13th

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square over time

  • Colombia
  • Rwanda
0200.0M400.0M600.0M800.0M196519942023

How they compare

Colombia currently reports 793.90 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 716.06 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 77.84 million constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Colombia's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.

Across all 41 years both countries report, Colombia has been ahead every year.

Colombia ranks 11th and Rwanda ranks 13th of 195 countries.

Colombia has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Rwanda Difference Ahead
1980s 232.97 million constant LCU per square kilometre 122.36 million constant LCU per square kilometre 110.62 million constant LCU per square kilometre Colombia
1990s 321.22 million constant LCU per square kilometre 108.88 million constant LCU per square kilometre 212.34 million constant LCU per square kilometre Colombia
2000s 424.68 million constant LCU per square kilometre 202.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre 222.44 million constant LCU per square kilometre Colombia
2010s 634.93 million constant LCU per square kilometre 422.00 million constant LCU per square kilometre 212.93 million constant LCU per square kilometre Colombia
2020s 745.87 million constant LCU per square kilometre 628.88 million constant LCU per square kilometre 116.99 million constant LCU per square kilometre Colombia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per square, Colombia or Rwanda?
Colombia, at 793.90 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 716.06 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per square between Colombia and Rwanda?
77.84 million constant LCU per square kilometre, with Colombia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Rwanda?
41 years are reported by both, from 1983 to 2023.
How do Colombia and Rwanda rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per square?
Colombia ranks 11th and Rwanda ranks 13th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs Rwanda: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/colombia/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/colombia/rwanda/">Colombia vs Rwanda: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
196 places, 7,796 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.