Botswana vs Jordan: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square

Botswana
346,844 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Jordan
400,670 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
173rd
Jordan rank
170th

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square over time

  • Botswana
  • Jordan
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k196119922023

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 400,670 constant LCU per square kilometre against 346,844 constant LCU per square kilometre in Botswana, a difference of 53,826 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Jordan's figure about 1.2 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Jordan ahead.

Botswana ranks 173rd and Jordan ranks 170th of 195 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and Jordan in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Jordan Difference Ahead
1970s 27,304 constant LCU per square kilometre 60,379 constant LCU per square kilometre 33,075 constant LCU per square kilometre Jordan
1980s 61,033 constant LCU per square kilometre 104,118 constant LCU per square kilometre 43,086 constant LCU per square kilometre Jordan
1990s 129,567 constant LCU per square kilometre 128,513 constant LCU per square kilometre 1,053 constant LCU per square kilometre Botswana
2000s 196,574 constant LCU per square kilometre 218,906 constant LCU per square kilometre 22,332 constant LCU per square kilometre Jordan
2010s 266,978 constant LCU per square kilometre 327,416 constant LCU per square kilometre 60,438 constant LCU per square kilometre Jordan
2020s 321,795 constant LCU per square kilometre 380,485 constant LCU per square kilometre 58,690 constant LCU per square kilometre Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per square, Botswana or Jordan?
Jordan, at 400,670 constant LCU per square kilometre against 346,844 constant LCU per square kilometre in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per square between Botswana and Jordan?
53,826 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Jordan?
48 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Jordan rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per square?
Botswana ranks 173rd and Jordan ranks 170th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Jordan: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/botswana/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/botswana/jordan/">Botswana vs Jordan: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
196 places, 7,796 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.