Austria vs Eswatini: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square

Austria
4.54 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini
3.81 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Austria rank
111th
Eswatini rank
114th

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square over time

  • Austria
  • Eswatini
1.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M5.0M197019962023

How they compare

Austria currently reports 4.54 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 3.81 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 737,410 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Austria's figure about 1.2 times Eswatini's.

Across all 53 years both countries report, Austria has been ahead every year.

Austria ranks 111th and Eswatini ranks 114th of 195 countries.

Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Eswatini Difference Ahead
1970s 1.71 million constant LCU per square kilometre 609,115 constant LCU per square kilometre 1.10 million constant LCU per square kilometre Austria
1980s 2.14 million constant LCU per square kilometre 933,667 constant LCU per square kilometre 1.21 million constant LCU per square kilometre Austria
1990s 2.79 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.82 million constant LCU per square kilometre 966,268 constant LCU per square kilometre Austria
2000s 3.55 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.32 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre Austria
2010s 4.07 million constant LCU per square kilometre 3.18 million constant LCU per square kilometre 890,928 constant LCU per square kilometre Austria
2020s 4.39 million constant LCU per square kilometre 3.67 million constant LCU per square kilometre 721,902 constant LCU per square kilometre Austria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per square, Austria or Eswatini?
Austria, at 4.54 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 3.81 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per square between Austria and Eswatini?
737,410 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Austria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Eswatini?
53 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2023.
How do Austria and Eswatini rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per square?
Austria ranks 111th and Eswatini ranks 114th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs Eswatini: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/austria/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/austria/eswatini/">Austria vs Eswatini: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
196 places, 7,796 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.