Argentina vs Zambia: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square

Argentina
217,646 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
207,759 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Argentina rank
180th
Zambia rank
181st

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square over time

  • Argentina
  • Zambia
50.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k196519942023

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 217,646 constant LCU per square kilometre against 207,759 constant LCU per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 9,887 constant LCU per square kilometre.

Across all 59 years both countries report, Argentina has been ahead every year.

Argentina ranks 180th and Zambia ranks 181st of 195 countries.

Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 70,049 constant LCU per square kilometre 38,670 constant LCU per square kilometre 31,379 constant LCU per square kilometre Argentina
1970s 93,008 constant LCU per square kilometre 45,492 constant LCU per square kilometre 47,516 constant LCU per square kilometre Argentina
1980s 106,850 constant LCU per square kilometre 49,158 constant LCU per square kilometre 57,692 constant LCU per square kilometre Argentina
1990s 132,139 constant LCU per square kilometre 52,277 constant LCU per square kilometre 79,862 constant LCU per square kilometre Argentina
2000s 163,300 constant LCU per square kilometre 81,328 constant LCU per square kilometre 81,972 constant LCU per square kilometre Argentina
2010s 215,283 constant LCU per square kilometre 154,670 constant LCU per square kilometre 60,614 constant LCU per square kilometre Argentina
2020s 209,961 constant LCU per square kilometre 192,121 constant LCU per square kilometre 17,840 constant LCU per square kilometre Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per square, Argentina or Zambia?
Argentina, at 217,646 constant LCU per square kilometre against 207,759 constant LCU per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per square between Argentina and Zambia?
9,887 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Zambia?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Zambia rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per square?
Argentina ranks 180th and Zambia ranks 181st of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Zambia: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/argentina/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/argentina/zambia/">Argentina vs Zambia: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
196 places, 7,796 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.